Building research projects differently: co-creating R&I with society

This practical guide distills key learnings from fifteen years of running responsible research and innovation programs with industry, researchers, social entrepreneurs, NGOs and local authorities. It explains why traditional attempts to open up research tend to plateau, how to co-create research with society rather than merely consulting it, when and at what scale to involve civil society (and why waiting for advanced technology-readiness levels is almost always too late), and how to rethink the economic, social and environmental valorization of research.

Written for the public research world, especially research organizations, universities and funding agencies, as well as policymakers looking to organize research and innovation differently. The guide is available in both English and French.

Innovating for the Transitions: a practical guide to collaborative impact innovation

This practical guide distills key learnings from fifteen years of running responsible research and innovation programs with industry, researchers, social entrepreneurs, NGOs and local authorities. It explains why classic open innovation falls short in the face of systemic challenges, what distinguishes responsible innovation from compliance, how to choose an open innovation format, and how to run and fund a collaborative impact innovation program, with an appendix mapping French and European funding schemes.

Written for practitioners, especially innovation and R&D directors, sustainability and CSR leaders who want to move beyond compliance, innovation intermediaries, funders, but also researchers and entrepreneurs who want to collaborate with the industrial worlds. The guide is available in both English and French.

Reference document proposing a definition of societal impact in research and innovation

This report proposes a shared international definition of societal impact in research and innovation. It unpacks the choices behind each term (what is included, what is not, and why) and addresses the ambiguities that often weaken impact discussions in institutional settings.

Glimpse of the report

It is a reference document developed within the High Level Forum (an international network of innovation ecosystems bringing together research institutions, industry leaders, and public decision-makers) through the Societal Impact Working Group led by SoScience.

It is particularly useful for structuring conversations in research organizations, aligning stakeholders, or challenging narrow interpretations of impact limited to economic or technological outputs.

Download ↓

Deep Tech startups and environmental impact: key challenges and operational frameworks (French resources)

Based on field interviews conducted with deeptech startups and innovation support actors, the report explores several structural issues that frequently emerge during early-stage Deep Tech development: impact projection versus measurement, rebound effects, multisector technological applications, and the difficulty of integrating environmental considerations into strategic R&D choices.

The report (in French) was produced by SoScience with Bpifrance.

Beyond impact assessment itself, it highlights a broader ecosystem challenge: many support structures surrounding Deep Tech entrepreneurship remain insufficiently equipped to help startups operationalize environmental impact considerations during early technological development.

You can find a discussion on the report's result in this recording of the roundtable organized during BIG 2024 by Bpifrance (in French).

Download ↓

Public-Planet Partnerships: integrating nature into innovation and governance processes

Public-Planet Partnerships (PPP) is a framework developed jointly by SoScience and 3BL Associates to explore a simple but largely overlooked question: what would change if ecosystems, species, and natural processes were considered legitimate stakeholders in innovation and development?

Positioned at the intersection of responsible innovation, systems thinking, and regenerative design, PPP proposes practical tools and case studies to help organizations build mutually beneficial collaborations between human systems and the living world. Rather than treating nature only as a constraint, a resource, or an inspiration, the framework explores how it can become an actual partner in problem-solving and governance processes.

You can access to the original Stanford Social Innovation Review article that introduce the PPP concept, browse the Public Planet Partnership website to find examples of interspecies collaborations and open tools or watch the video below. It may be particularly useful for innovators and organizations working on sustainability, governance, or the future of innovation systems.

Rome Declaration on Responsible Research and Innovation

The Rome Declaration is a foundational European policy document that helped formalise the principles of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) across EU research and innovation systems.

Photo de <a href="https://unsplash.com/fr/@_louisreed?utm_source=unsplash&utm_medium=referral&utm_content=creditCopyText">Louis Reed</a>sur <a href="https://unsplash.com/fr/photos/remplissage-de-liquide-sur-tubes-pwcKF7L4-no?utm_source=unsplash&utm_medium=referral&utm_content=creditCopyText">Unsplash</a>

The declaration played a key role in shaping the RRI framework later embedded in Horizon 2020 and subsequent European research programmes. It emphasises that research and innovation are deeply embedded in social contexts, requiring anticipatory governance, reflexivity, and inclusive participation.

This resource provides direct access to the original declaration so that practitioners, researchers, policymakers, and citizens can easily consult the source text rather than relying on secondary interpretations. It is intended as a reference point for anyone working on responsible innovation, science-society relations, or the governance of emerging technologies.

Download ↓